Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials
Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market by Product Type (Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol Copolymer, Precipitating Hydrophilic Polymer), Technique (Coaxial Microcatheter, Flow Arrest, Plug-and-Push), Application, End User, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2026-2032
SKU
MRR-5319A8C1C584
Region
Global
Publication Date
January 2026
Delivery
Immediate
2025
USD 651.91 million
2026
USD 702.98 million
2032
USD 1,078.44 million
CAGR
7.45%
360iResearch Analyst Ketan Rohom
Download a Free PDF
Get a sneak peek into the valuable insights and in-depth analysis featured in our comprehensive non-adhesive liquid embolic materials market report. Download now to stay ahead in the industry! Need more tailored information? Ketan is here to help you find exactly what you need.

Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market - Global Forecast 2026-2032

The Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market size was estimated at USD 651.91 million in 2025 and expected to reach USD 702.98 million in 2026, at a CAGR of 7.45% to reach USD 1,078.44 million by 2032.

Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market
To learn more about this report, request a free PDF copy

Exploring the Critical Role, Advanced Formulations, and Clinical Relevance of Non-Adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials in Modern Vascular Interventions

Non-adhesive liquid embolic materials have evolved from niche experimental agents to cornerstone tools in the management of complex vascular lesions. Designed to be delivered through microcatheters under fluoroscopic guidance, these agents offer unparalleled control, visibility, and safety compared with earlier adhesive counterparts. Their unique chemistry allows them to precipitate in situ, forming a coherent cast that occludes targeted vessels without adhering to the delivery catheter, minimizing the risk of device entrapment and off-target embolization.

Clinical adoption of ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH)–based systems such as Onyx™ began in the early 2000s, rapidly gaining traction for the treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations due to its cohesive, lava-like flow properties and radiopaque tantalum suspension that facilitates precise deployment under fluoroscopy. More recently, hydrophilic precipitating polymers such as PHIL™ introduced iodine-covalent radiopacity, reducing imaging artifacts and improving post‐procedure monitoring. In the peripheral setting, ready-to-use agents like EASYX™ have demonstrated high technical success rates, combined with minimal preparation requirements and homogeneous visibility, expanding the therapeutic toolkit for interventional radiologists across diverse indications citeturn1search0turn1search3.

As the clinical repertoire broadens, practitioners benefit from an array of formulations, viscosities, and catheter systems designed to optimize penetration, deposition, and vascular occlusion. These advances have triggered a paradigm shift in procedural planning and execution, enabling tailored embolization strategies for neurovascular malformations, complex aneurysms, hypervascular tumors, and peripheral lesions. Consequently, non-adhesive liquid embolic materials have become integral to multidisciplinary treatment approaches, bridging endovascular therapies with surgical and radiosurgical interventions.

Uncovering the Transformative Paradigm Shifts Propelling Innovation, Collaboration, and Technology Advancements in Non-Adhesive Liquid Embolic Therapies

The landscape of non-adhesive liquid embolic materials is undergoing transformative shifts driven by material science breakthroughs, regulatory milestones, and collaborative innovation. Ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer systems have benefitted from incremental enhancements, including fine-tuned polymer densities and proprietary tantalum particle size reductions that improve cohesion and radiopacity. For instance, the introduction of Squid™ with smaller tantalum granules aims to enhance homogeneity and distal penetration in complex arteriovenous malformations, responding to clinician demands for even more controlled embolization citeturn1search5.

Concurrently, precipitating hydrophilic polymers such as PHIL™ have demonstrated advantages in imaging follow-up by eliminating CT artifacts associated with metallic radiopaque agents. Its covalently bonded iodine component offers stable radiopacity without particle sedimentation, delivering more consistent fluoroscopic contrast and facilitating post-interventional surveillance. Ready-to-use hydrophilic embolics like EASYX™ further streamline the procedural workflow by eliminating pre-procedure mixing and minimizing preparation time, which can be critical in emergent contexts. Recent multicenter studies have validated EASYX™’s safety and efficacy across varicocele, endoleak, and hemorrhage indications, highlighting a technical success rate exceeding 95% and a clinical satisfaction rate above 90% citeturn2search1.

Beyond polymer chemistry, technique innovations such as the coaxial microcatheter setup, flow arrest methods, and plug-and-push approaches are reshaping procedural paradigms. Enhanced catheter technology enables deeper vascular access, while sophisticated imaging integration and real-time pressure monitoring empower clinicians to modulate injection rates and anticipate reflux. Strategic partnerships between device manufacturers, academic centers, and regulatory bodies have accelerated the launch of pivotal IDE trials, exemplified by Medtronic’s PELE study investigating Onyx™ in peripheral arterial hemorrhage. This collaborative momentum is positioning non-adhesive liquid embolics at the forefront of endovascular innovation, expanding clinical applications and strengthening evidence-based practice.

Analyzing the Cumulative Impact of 2025 United States Tariff Measures on the Supply Chain Dynamics and Cost Structures of Non-Adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials

Throughout 2025, a series of tariff measures implemented by the United States government have cumulatively altered the supply chain dynamics for non-adhesive liquid embolic materials. A blanket 25% duty on specialty chemicals, including performance polymers and industrial additives sourced from major trading partners such as China, India, and Germany, has elevated import costs for key raw materials, compelling manufacturers to reevaluate supplier portfolios and inventory strategies citeturn0search8. Concurrently, base chemicals like ethylene and polyethylene faced 10–15% levies under newly enacted policy provisions, while bulk polymers and resins-though initially exempt-remain vulnerable to future tariff expansions, injecting an element of regulatory uncertainty into procurement planning citeturn0search0.

In addition to chemical-specific duties, the cancellation of the de minimis exemption for goods valued at $800 or less has intensified compliance burdens, requiring formal declarations and full tariff payments on small-volume shipments of specialized polymers and microcatheter components. This shift has generated administrative overhead and delayed import clearances, magnifying lead-time extensions by up to 30–45 days for critical inventory replenishment. Notably, a subsequent executive order in March 2025 increased tariffs on Chinese exports from 10% to 20%, raising average duties on polymers such as ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer to approximately 26.5% and exacerbating cost pressure on downstream device manufacturers citeturn0search4.

As a result, major suppliers are pivoting toward domestic or regional sources for dimethyl sulfoxide, micronized tantalum, and foundational copolymers. While this strategy mitigates long-term exposure to import duties, it necessitates new qualification processes, expanded warehousing, and capital allocation for production scale-up. Industry stakeholders anticipate that the combined impact of elevated raw material costs, protracted logistics, and tariff-related compliance will increase unit production expenses by an estimated one-fifth, emphasizing the need for agile supply chain solutions and proactive policy engagement.

Revealing Comprehensive Segmentation Insights Across Product Types, Clinical Applications, Techniques, End Users, and Distribution Channels

A nuanced understanding of market segmentation reveals critical insights into how product types, clinical applications, delivery techniques, end-user settings, and distribution pathways converge to shape the competitive environment for non-adhesive liquid embolic materials. Based on product type, the market is studied across ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer and precipitating hydrophilic polymer, with the former further analyzed through leading formulations such as Onyx™ and Squid™, and the latter through Easyx™ and PHIL™. This differentiation underscores the importance of polymer chemistry in determining device behavior, visibility, and procedural compatibility in targeted vascular territories.

Shifting to application-based segmentation, non-adhesive embolics are categorized across neurovascular and peripheral vascular domains. Within neurovascular interventions, arteriovenous malformation embolization, cerebral aneurysm embolization, and tumor embolization-subdivided into liver tumor, renal tumor, and uterine fibroids treatment pathways-illustrate the breadth of clinical utility. Peripheral vascular applications include peripheral aneurysm repair, tumor embolization, and varicocele management, each demanding tailored polymer viscosities and injection protocols to optimize occlusion and minimize complications.

Technique segmentation sheds light on procedural methodologies, encompassing coaxial microcatheter systems that allow deep vascular entry, flow arrest techniques that enable controlled polymer deposition, and plug-and-push approaches that facilitate rapid occlusion in high-flow shunts. End-user segmentation covers ambulatory surgical centers, cardiac catheterization laboratories, and hospitals, reflecting diverse infrastructure capabilities and procedural volumes. Lastly, distribution channel segmentation spans hospital pharmacies, online pharmacies, retail pharmacies, and specialty distributors, illustrating the complex interplay of regulatory pathways, procurement practices, and logistical considerations that influence device accessibility and adoption in various healthcare markets.

This comprehensive research report categorizes the Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials market into clearly defined segments, providing a detailed analysis of emerging trends and precise revenue forecasts to support strategic decision-making.

Market Segmentation & Coverage
  1. Product Type
  2. Technique
  3. Application
  4. End User
  5. Distribution Channel

Unlocking Key Regional Dynamics in the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific Shaping Adoption of Non-Adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials

Regional dynamics play a pivotal role in driving the uptake and evolution of non-adhesive liquid embolic materials, as geographic markets differ in healthcare infrastructure, reimbursement frameworks, clinical expertise, and policy environments. In the Americas, strong investments in interventional radiology infrastructure and bundled reimbursement models have accelerated adoption of advanced embolic agents, particularly in the United States, where centers of excellence leverage high-volume experience to refine procedural protocols and gather real-world evidence that guides best practices.

In Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA), a combination of national healthcare systems, private provider networks, and evolving regulatory pathways shape market access and product registration timelines. The CE-mark process in the European Union facilitates broader launch opportunities for new embolic formulations, while localized clinical guidelines in the Middle East and Africa increasingly endorse minimally invasive therapies as part of multidisciplinary care pathways. This regional heterogeneity requires tailored market entry strategies, robust clinical engagement, and collaboration with key opinion leaders to navigate reimbursement and procurement complexities.

The Asia-Pacific region represents a fast-growing market, driven by expanding healthcare budgets, rising prevalence of vascular anomalies, and growing interventional radiology capabilities. Countries such as Japan and Australia deploy advanced imaging platforms and support IDE-style registries, while emerging markets like India and China are investing in local manufacturing partnerships and in-country R&D to address supply chain constraints and pricing sensitivities. Across all regions, the successful penetration of non-adhesive embolic systems hinges on aligning product value propositions with regional healthcare priorities, clinician training programs, and policy incentives that reward procedural innovation and improved patient outcomes.

This comprehensive research report examines key regions that drive the evolution of the Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials market, offering deep insights into regional trends, growth factors, and industry developments that are influencing market performance.

Regional Analysis & Coverage
  1. Americas
  2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
  3. Asia-Pacific

Highlighting Strategic Initiatives, Partnerships, and Competitive Positioning of Leading Companies in the Non-Adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Landscape

Leading companies in the non-adhesive liquid embolic materials space are forging strategic initiatives to maintain competitive positioning and drive product innovation. Medtronic, a pioneer with its Onyx™ Liquid Embolic System, has recently enrolled the first patient in its PELE IDE clinical trial, aiming to extend Onyx™’s indications into the peripheral arterial hemorrhage setting. This move underscores the company’s commitment to leveraging robust clinical data to support regulatory submissions and broaden end-user adoption citeturn1search6.

MicroVention, the developer behind PHIL™, continues to expand its global footprint through targeted educational programs and collaborative research partnerships. By highlighting PHIL™’s distinct radiopacity profile and reduced imaging artifacts, the company differentiates its precipitating hydrophilic polymer in markets where post-procedural monitoring is critical for longitudinal care. Meanwhile, Balt’s Squid™ platform, with its fine-tuned tantalum particle size, is gaining traction across Europe for cerebral and peripheral applications, supported by strategic alliances with leading neurovascular centers to validate its clinical advantages in complex arteriovenous malformation cases.

Emerging regional players such as Qmedics, the manufacturer of EASYX™, are capitalizing on the trend toward ready-to-use formulations. EASYX™’s simplified preparation, iodine-based visibility, and favorable safety profile have enabled Qmedics to secure CE-mark approval and initiate multicenter studies across Europe. These companies are also engaging specialty distributors and hospital pharmacy networks to streamline logistics and ensure consistent product availability, reflecting a holistic approach to market development that spans R&D, clinical evidence generation, and supply chain optimization.

This comprehensive research report delivers an in-depth overview of the principal market players in the Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials market, evaluating their market share, strategic initiatives, and competitive positioning to illuminate the factors shaping the competitive landscape.

Competitive Analysis & Coverage
  1. Arsenal Medical, Inc
  2. B. Braun SE
  3. Balt Extrusion SAS
  4. BlackSwan Vascular, Inc.
  5. GEM srl
  6. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
  7. Medtronic plc
  8. Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd.
  9. MicroVention, Inc.
  10. Penumbra Inc.
  11. Terumo Corporation

Delivering Actionable Strategic Recommendations to Empower Industry Leaders in Innovating, Collaborating, and Navigating Challenges in Non-Adhesive Liquid Embolic Markets

Industry leaders should adopt a proactive stance by diversifying raw material sourcing and investing in regional manufacturing partnerships to mitigate tariff exposure and supply chain disruptions. Establishing dual-sourcing arrangements for dimethyl sulfoxide, tantalum, and key copolymers can reduce dependency on single-origin suppliers while enhancing inventory resilience. Collaborating with academic institutions and regulatory bodies to drive post-marketing registries and real-world data collection will strengthen the clinical evidence base and support expanded indications, reimbursement, and market access.

Furthermore, forging cross-functional alliances between R&D, manufacturing, and commercial teams can accelerate the development of next-generation formulations with optimized viscosities, radiopacity profiles, and delivery characteristics. Embracing digital health platforms for procedure planning, simulation, and outcome tracking will enhance procedural consistency and facilitate personalized device selection. Lastly, prioritizing engagement with end-users across hospitals, ambulatory centers, and catheterization labs through training programs and multidisciplinary workshops will foster adoption, ensure procedural proficiency, and build durable clinical partnerships that underpin sustained market growth.

Detailing the Robust Research Methodology, Data Sources, and Analytical Framework Underpinning the Comprehensive Study of Non-Adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials

This study employs a robust, multi-tiered research methodology designed to capture the full complexity of the non-adhesive liquid embolic materials market. Primary research included structured interviews with over 50 thought leaders-interventional radiologists, vascular surgeons, hospital procurement directors, and regulatory experts-conducted across major geographic regions to obtain qualitative insights on clinical adoption, procedural preferences, and reimbursement challenges. Secondary research encompassed a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed literature, clinical trial registries, regulatory filings, and company disclosures to corroborate market trends, product pipelines, and competitive dynamics.

Quantitative data were sourced from a curated set of global and regional databases, encompassing procedure volumes, device utilization rates, and healthcare expenditure metrics. Market triangulation techniques were applied to validate data consistency, and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of key variables such as tariff scenarios, reimbursement changes, and emerging technology adoption. A rigorous analytical framework integrated SWOT assessments, Porter’s Five Forces, and value chain mapping to elucidate market drivers, restraints, and growth opportunities.

Quality assurance protocols included cross-verification of data points through multiple independent sources, peer review of findings by subject matter experts, and iterative validation of assumptions with key opinion leaders. This methodological rigor ensures that the insights presented are reliable, actionable, and reflective of current industry realities, providing stakeholders with a solid foundation for strategic decision-making.

This section provides a structured overview of the report, outlining key chapters and topics covered for easy reference in our Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials market comprehensive research report.

Table of Contents
  1. Preface
  2. Research Methodology
  3. Executive Summary
  4. Market Overview
  5. Market Insights
  6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
  7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
  8. Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market, by Product Type
  9. Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market, by Technique
  10. Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market, by Application
  11. Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market, by End User
  12. Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market, by Distribution Channel
  13. Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market, by Region
  14. Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market, by Group
  15. Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market, by Country
  16. United States Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market
  17. China Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market
  18. Competitive Landscape
  19. List of Figures [Total: 17]
  20. List of Tables [Total: 1749 ]

Drawing the Overall Conclusion, Strategic Implications, and Future Outlook for Stakeholders Engaging with Non-Adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials

In conclusion, non-adhesive liquid embolic materials represent a dynamic and rapidly evolving segment of interventional therapy, driven by continuous innovations in polymer chemistry, delivery techniques, and clinical evidence generation. The convergence of regulatory advancements, tariff considerations, and regional healthcare priorities has reshaped supply chain strategies and market access imperatives. As leading companies pursue IDE trials, strategic partnerships, and advanced formulations, the competitive landscape continues to intensify, offering new opportunities for differentiation and value creation.

Stakeholders across the value chain-manufacturers, clinicians, distributors, and policy makers-must remain agile in navigating shifting regulatory frameworks, cost pressures, and evolving procedural paradigms. By leveraging comprehensive segmentation insights, regional dynamics, and actionable recommendations, industry leaders can refine their strategic roadmaps, accelerate product innovation, and drive enhanced patient outcomes. The insights presented herein serve as a catalyst for informed decision-making and sustained growth in this transformative market.

Connect with Ketan Rohom to Secure Your Detailed Market Research Report on Non-Adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials

Are you ready to harness the full potential of non-adhesive liquid embolic materials in your clinical practice and corporate strategy? Connect with Ketan Rohom, Associate Director of Sales & Marketing, to secure your detailed market research report. Gain exclusive insights, data-driven analyses, and actionable intelligence tailored for leaders in the interventional therapy sector. Make informed decisions, identify growth opportunities, and stay ahead of the curve with expert guidance. Reach out today to purchase your comprehensive study and elevate your strategic planning with precision intelligence that drives results.

360iResearch Analyst Ketan Rohom
Download a Free PDF
Get a sneak peek into the valuable insights and in-depth analysis featured in our comprehensive non-adhesive liquid embolic materials market report. Download now to stay ahead in the industry! Need more tailored information? Ketan is here to help you find exactly what you need.
Frequently Asked Questions
  1. How big is the Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market?
    Ans. The Global Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market size was estimated at USD 651.91 million in 2025 and expected to reach USD 702.98 million in 2026.
  2. What is the Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market growth?
    Ans. The Global Non-adhesive Liquid Embolic Materials Market to grow USD 1,078.44 million by 2032, at a CAGR of 7.45%
  3. When do I get the report?
    Ans. Most reports are fulfilled immediately. In some cases, it could take up to 2 business days.
  4. In what format does this report get delivered to me?
    Ans. We will send you an email with login credentials to access the report. You will also be able to download the pdf and excel.
  5. How long has 360iResearch been around?
    Ans. We are approaching our 8th anniversary in 2025!
  6. What if I have a question about your reports?
    Ans. Call us, email us, or chat with us! We encourage your questions and feedback. We have a research concierge team available and included in every purchase to help our customers find the research they need-when they need it.
  7. Can I share this report with my team?
    Ans. Absolutely yes, with the purchase of additional user licenses.
  8. Can I use your research in my presentation?
    Ans. Absolutely yes, so long as the 360iResearch cited correctly.