Market research

Serverless Security Market

Explore licenses

Assess the study’s coverageRead the public overview, then compare the chapter outline with your research brief.

17report chapters

360iResearch introduction

Public research overview

Introduction to Serverless Security

Serverless security addresses the protection of applications built with function-as-a-service, managed application services, event-driven workflows, and other cloud-native components. Its scope includes identity and access management, secure configuration, dependency governance, runtime protection, data security, API protection, logging, and compliance. Because providers operate much of the underlying infrastructure, organizations must place greater emphasis on application code, permissions, event paths, third-party packages, and service-to-service interactions.

Inside the research

Coverage at a glance

Selected branches from the published table of contents. Follow a chapter to see every subchapter in context.

  1. Chapter 7 Service Type

    • Backend As A Service
    • Function As A Service
    View chapter
  2. Chapter 8 Security Solution Type

    • API Security
    • Compliance Management
    • Data Encryption
    • Identity And Access Management
    More in this chapter
  3. Chapter 9 Organization Size

    • Large Enterprises
    • Small & Medium Enterprises
    View chapter

Transformative Shifts Reshaping Serverless Security

Serverless adoption is shifting security from infrastructure hardening toward continuous control of code, identities, configurations, and event flows. Short-lived functions, rapid deployment pipelines, and extensive use of managed services increase the importance of least-privilege permissions, software supply-chain controls, secrets management, and centralized observability. Security teams are also integrating testing into development workflows, using policy-as-code and automated remediation to address misconfigurations before deployment and to investigate runtime anomalies more quickly.

The Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence is expanding both the defensive capabilities and the attack surface of serverless environments. Defensive applications include anomaly detection across function activity, prioritization of vulnerabilities, automated analysis of infrastructure-as-code, and assistance with incident investigation. At the same time, AI-generated code can introduce insecure dependencies, excessive permissions, data leakage, or weak validation when it is not reviewed systematically. Organizations therefore need traceable development processes, human approval for high-impact changes, controls for model and prompt data, and testing that covers both conventional functions and AI-enabled workloads.

Regional Insights Across the Global Landscape

North America is characterized by mature cloud adoption, extensive regulatory scrutiny, and strong integration between application security and cloud operations. Europe places particular emphasis on privacy, resilience, digital-service governance, and demonstrable accountability. Asia-Pacific combines rapidly expanding cloud-native development with varied regulatory environments and uneven levels of security maturity. The Middle East is prioritizing secure digital transformation and critical-infrastructure protection, while Africa is balancing cloud adoption with skills, connectivity, and resource constraints. Latin America is advancing cloud use across financial, public, and commercial services, increasing the need for practical identity, monitoring, and compliance controls.

Group-Level Priorities for Serverless Security

ASEAN organizations commonly need scalable security practices that accommodate diverse regulations, distributed development, and accelerating digital services. BRICS members face differing national policies and technology ecosystems, making portability, local compliance, and supply-chain assurance important considerations. European Union stakeholders must align serverless controls with privacy, cybersecurity, resilience, and incident-reporting obligations. G7 members generally emphasize advanced governance, secure software development, and protection of critical services. GCC organizations are combining cloud modernization with sovereignty and critical-infrastructure requirements, while NATO stakeholders place additional weight on resilience, interoperability, identity assurance, and protection against sophisticated threats.

Country-Level Developments and Considerations

Australia and Canada emphasize privacy, resilience, and secure government and enterprise cloud adoption. Brazil and Mexico are strengthening digital-service security while addressing regulatory and operational diversity. China is developing cloud and data-security practices within a closely governed technology environment. France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom are focused on regulatory compliance, resilience, software assurance, and protection of public and private digital services. India is expanding cloud-native delivery across a large and diverse technology ecosystem, increasing demand for automated governance and workforce capability. Japan and South Korea combine advanced digital infrastructure with strong attention to operational continuity and supply-chain risk. Russia presents a distinct environment shaped by national technology controls, data-governance considerations, and cybersecurity resilience requirements. The United States continues to emphasize secure development, identity-centric controls, compliance, and protection of cloud-dependent services.

Actionable Priorities for Industry Leaders

Leaders should establish a serverless security baseline covering identity, permissions, secrets, dependencies, APIs, event triggers, data flows, logging, and provider configurations. Embed these controls into software delivery through infrastructure-as-code scanning, dependency verification, automated policy checks, and pre-deployment testing. Maintain an inventory of functions and connected services, map business-critical data paths, and apply risk-based runtime monitoring. Governance should define ownership across development, security, and operations; require documented exceptions; and test incident response for compromised credentials, vulnerable packages, malicious events, and provider-service disruptions. Organizations adopting AI should add review gates for generated code and controls for sensitive data used by models and tools.

Research Methodology for the Executive Summary

This executive summary is based on the defined subject of serverless security and a structured review of the security issues associated with function-based cloud services, managed application components, event-driven architectures, software delivery practices, artificial intelligence, and regional regulatory environments. Insights are synthesized thematically across technology, governance, operations, and risk management. Regional, group, and country observations are presented as qualitative context rather than quantitative estimates, rankings, forecasts, or market measurements.

Conclusion: Building Resilient Serverless Environments

Serverless security is becoming an integrated discipline spanning application engineering, cloud governance, identity, supply-chain assurance, data protection, and runtime operations. The most resilient organizations will treat security as a continuous control system rather than a final review, combining automated checks with accountable human oversight. Regional and regulatory differences make adaptable governance essential, while AI increases the need for provenance, testing, and disciplined data handling. A clear asset inventory, least-privilege design, observable workloads, and practiced response processes provide a durable foundation for secure serverless adoption.

Research report

Table of contents

  1. 1.Preface
    1. 1.1Objectives of the Study
    2. 1.2Market Definition
    3. 1.3Market Segmentation & Coverage
    4. 1.4Years Considered for the Study
    5. 1.5Currency Considered for the Study
    6. 1.6Language Considered for the Study
    7. 1.7Key Stakeholders
  2. 2.Research Methodology
    1. 2.1Introduction
    2. 2.2Research Design
      1. 2.2.1Primary Research
      2. 2.2.2Secondary Research
    3. 2.3Research Framework
      1. 2.3.1Qualitative Analysis
      2. 2.3.2Quantitative Analysis
    4. 2.4Market Size Estimation
      1. 2.4.1Top-Down Approach
      2. 2.4.2Bottom-Up Approach
    5. 2.5Data Triangulation
    6. 2.6Research Outcomes
    7. 2.7Research Assumptions
    8. 2.8Research Limitations
  3. 3.Executive Summary
    1. 3.1Introduction
    2. 3.2CXO Perspective
    3. 3.3New Revenue Opportunities
    4. 3.4Next-Generation Business Models
    5. 3.5Industry Roadmap
  4. 4.Market Overview
    1. 4.1Introduction
    2. 4.2Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
      1. 4.2.1Supply-Side Analysis
      2. 4.2.2Demand-Side Analysis
      3. 4.2.3Stakeholder Analysis
    3. 4.3Market Dynamics
      1. 4.3.1Key Drivers
      2. 4.3.2Key Restraints
      3. 4.3.3Key Opportunities
      4. 4.3.4Key Challenges
    4. 4.4Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    5. 4.5PESTLE Analysis
    6. 4.6Market Outlook
      1. 4.6.1Near-Term Market Outlook (0–2 Years)
      2. 4.6.2Medium-Term Market Outlook (3–5 Years)
      3. 4.6.3Long-Term Market Outlook (5–10 Years)
    7. 4.7Go-to-Market Strategy
  5. 5.Market Insights
    1. 5.1Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
    2. 5.2Consumer Experience Benchmarking
    3. 5.3Opportunity Mapping
    4. 5.4Distribution Channel Analysis
    5. 5.5Pricing Trend Analysis
    6. 5.6Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
    7. 5.7ESG & Sustainability Analysis
    8. 5.8Disruption & Risk Scenarios
    9. 5.9Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
  6. 6.Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2026
  7. 7.Serverless Security Market, by Service Type
    1. 7.1Introduction
    2. 7.2Backend As A Service
    3. 7.3Function As A Service
  8. 8.Serverless Security Market, by Security Solution Type
    1. 8.1Introduction
    2. 8.2API Security
    3. 8.3Compliance Management
      1. 8.3.1Audit And Reporting
      2. 8.3.2Policy Management
    4. 8.4Data Encryption
      1. 8.4.1At Rest Encryption
      2. 8.4.2In Transit Encryption
      3. 8.4.3Key Management
    5. 8.5Identity And Access Management
      1. 8.5.1Multi Factor Authentication
      2. 8.5.2Privilege Management
      3. 8.5.3Single Sign On
    6. 8.6Runtime Protection
      1. 8.6.1Container Security
      2. 8.6.2Runtime Application Self Protection
      3. 8.6.3Sandbox Security
  9. 9.Serverless Security Market, by Organization Size
    1. 9.1Introduction
    2. 9.2Large Enterprises
    3. 9.3Small & Medium Enterprises
  10. 10.Serverless Security Market, by Deployment Model
    1. 10.1Introduction
    2. 10.2Hybrid Cloud
    3. 10.3Private Cloud
    4. 10.4Public Cloud
  11. 11.Serverless Security Market, by End Use Industry
    1. 11.1Introduction
    2. 11.2Banking Financial Services And Insurance
    3. 11.3Government Public Sector
    4. 11.4Healthcare
    5. 11.5Information Technology And Telecom
    6. 11.6Retail And Ecommerce
  12. 12.Serverless Security Market, by Region
    1. 12.1Introduction
    2. 12.2Asia-Pacific
    3. 12.3Europe
    4. 12.4North America
    5. 12.5Latin America
    6. 12.6Africa
    7. 12.7Middle East
  13. 13.Serverless Security Market, by Group
    1. 13.1Introduction
    2. 13.2NATO
    3. 13.3G7
    4. 13.4BRICS
    5. 13.5European Union
    6. 13.6ASEAN
    7. 13.7GCC
  14. 14.Serverless Security Market, by Country
    1. 14.1Introduction
    2. 14.2China
    3. 14.3United States
    4. 14.4Japan
    5. 14.5India
    6. 14.6Germany
    7. 14.7United Kingdom
    8. 14.8Australia
    9. 14.9France
    10. 14.10South Korea
    11. 14.11Italy
    12. 14.12Canada
    13. 14.13Russia
    14. 14.14Brazil
    15. 14.15Mexico
    16. 14.16Spain
  15. 15.Competitive Landscape
    1. 15.1Market Share Analysis, 2025
    2. 15.2Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
      1. 15.2.1Concentration Ratio (CR)
      2. 15.2.2Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
    3. 15.3Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
    4. 15.4Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
    5. 15.5Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  16. 16.Company Profiles
    1. 16.1Aqua Security Software Ltd.
    2. 16.2Broadcom Inc.
    3. 16.3Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
    4. 16.4Cisco Systems, Inc.
    5. 16.5CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
    6. 16.6Datadog, Inc.
    7. 16.7Dynatrace, Inc.
    8. 16.8Elastic N.V.
    9. 16.9Firefly Operations Ltd.
    10. 16.10Fortinet, Inc.
    11. 16.11GitLab Inc.
    12. 16.12HashiCorp, Inc.
    13. 16.13IBM Corporation
    14. 16.14New Relic, Inc.
    15. 16.15Orca Security Ltd.
    16. 16.16Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
    17. 16.17Qualys, Inc.
    18. 16.18Rapid7, Inc.
    19. 16.19SentinelOne, Inc.
    20. 16.20Snyk Limited
    21. 16.21Sonrai Security Inc.
    22. 16.22Sophos Ltd
    23. 16.23Sysdig, Inc.
    24. 16.24Tenable Holdings, Inc.
    25. 16.25Trend Micro Incorporated
    26. 16.26Wiz, Inc.
  17. 17.Key Experts

Loading the sample request form…